02 Nov 2015 admin In G+ Posts

Comments: 31

  1. Kl choo 2 Nov 2015 Reply


  2. Maria Alfano 2 Nov 2015 Reply


  3. steve Franklin 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    That is cool

  4. Marcin Jasiński 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    not bad equipment;)

  5. Bradley Hale 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    That b-2 has some nice weapons

  6. Rahul Choudhary 2 Nov 2015 Reply


  7. Lejs Lucky 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    During 1999 nato agression we take it out… Not so invisible

  8. 9090 Furniture 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    woow. . . Bom

  9. Mark Meredith 2 Nov 2015 Reply


  10. Unload that shit on Ramadan.

  11. Ziyad Taher 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    +FEMINIST KILL ALL MEN Hmm a bit rude… Why should they do that during Ramadan?

  12. Felipe Junqueira 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    Quero um desse pra mim…

  13. Avineesh Suppiah 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    Now why isn't that going after ISIS?

  14. Jeff Clough 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    Attacking ISIS with this would be like attacking New York street gangs by bombing New York City. Ridding ourselves of ISIS will require the personal touch, and you can't do that from bombing altitude.

  15. Leon Mata 2 Nov 2015 Reply


  16. Wing Wong 2 Nov 2015 Reply

    That is beautiful.

  17. Death and Destruction never looked so beautiful

  18. Anne X 3 Nov 2015 Reply

    Beautiful ❤

  19. Myriam G 3 Nov 2015 Reply

    My all time favorite B2

  20. Blane Bailey 3 Nov 2015 Reply

    Load em' up & let em' fly!!

  21. Mineth Perera 3 Nov 2015 Reply

    Now that's ammo

  22. Peter Smith 3 Nov 2015 Reply

    May be not but it wood most definatlley rid us pf a few of em .

  23. Philip Lacroix 3 Nov 2015 Reply

    It could wipe out ISIS by itself. .

  24. Wing Wong 4 Nov 2015 Reply

    As amazing as that bomber is, it is the wrong tool for the job.

    The bomber was designed for larger scale war against nations and their armies. You leveled whole swaths of land. Everything within the target zone that wasn't armored and avoided a direct hit was either dead or dying.

    Such a blunt instrument would only victimize civilians and make the US more enemies.

    As +Jeff Clough noted, you can't solve the problem from bombing altitude. By killing from above/afar, it makes it stupid easy for terror groups to demonize the US and its troops.

    We'll need the bombers for future large scale wars. But for the war waged against decentralized terror groups, it's probably more apt to view it from the point of view as a disease. We need to immunize people against the toxic cause so that their numbers don't increase. Make it so that their safe havens turn them away. And work tirelessly and accurately, to route those who have sided with those groups, whittling down their numbers.

    Otherwise, it becomes a protracted war filled with endless skirmishes that ends up costing lives needlessly.

  25. von Majzel 5 Nov 2015 Reply

    Sooooo much democracy !

  26. mais mais

  27. Shit!

  28. Annette Gutierrez 22 Nov 2015 Reply

    +Jeff Clough agreed, we need to get back to "old-school" CIA cold war intelligence gathering

  29. Jeff Clough 22 Nov 2015 Reply

    +Annette Gutierrez, I'd prefer a cold war to this rabbid terrorism, but ISIS wants a very hot "war." Plus, a cold war requires diplomatic channels to be open. I'm afraid this is going to get even more bloody than we've already seen.

  30. Annette Gutierrez 22 Nov 2015 Reply

    +Jeff Clough yes, but we need smart guys on the ground, not "soldiers," per se, but intelligence gathering by individuals that can get behind enemy lines, infiltrate their camps

  31. Annette Gutierrez 22 Nov 2015 Reply

    Plus when the CIA was in its infancy, diplomatic channels were hardly a concern, as most of their clandestine activities were off the books

Leave a Comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *