New Photoshop Tool Reveals Where Pictures Have Been Airbrushed
We don't know about you, but we get irked when we can sense a photo has been airbrushed, but can't really put our finger on what the changes are.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/29/photoshop-tool-airbrushing-revealed_n_1119212.html
New Photoshop Tool Reveals Where Pictures Have Been Airbrushed
We don’t know about you, but we get irked when we can sense a photo has been airbrushed, but can’t really put our finger on what the changes are.
This post has been reshared 6 times on Google+
View this post on Google+
Now, onto the silicone implants!
+Brent Burzycki 😛
+Rima Regas You can use IR imagers to tell if people have fakers……
Photoshop tool?
+Norman Ma Yep does appear it would be something for a future version possibly..
Here is the Mashable Article:
http://mashable.com/2011/11/29/photoshop-celebrities-models/
Whatever. In 5 minutes there will be software created to mask editting effects that are detectable.
Honestly, if you can't really tell what is fake and what is real, you've got bigger problems – you should probably get out more often.
+Michael Braucht would you like to tell that to the press… they sure seem to be clueless…..
And anyone that likes watching anything with Kim Karassholian in it…
+Brent Burzycki I was just being facetious. Seriously, though, many instances of air-brushing and other alterations are detectable by people who are not experts. Beyond the perfect skin and bodies, there is still a lot that gets by the average person.
I edit all my images I need to run one via the tool…. I could not imagine with sharpening and other tools I use that it would not just be one huge alert…
+Brent Burzycki There distinctions, I think, that most people would agree on. I would think context and purpose are what determine where the distinctions end?
well … DUH. of course her teats have been altered.
I thought that was an eye-tracking diagram until I read the title.
Wouldn't it just be easier to say what photos have not been altered?
Probably…..seeing most have……altered is also a strange word……. That would need a real definition…
True. I guess "look 10+ years younger than original" isn't very scientific.